Operation Wetback was a repatriation project of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service to remove undocumented Mexican immigrants (pejoratively referred to as . During the first decades of the twentieth century, the majority of migrant workers who crossed the border illegally did not have adequate protection against exploitation by American farmers. As a result of the Good Neighbor Policy, Mexico and the United States began negotiating an accord to protect the rights of Mexican agricultural workers. Continuing discussions and modifications of the agreement were so successful that the Congress chose to formalize the . In the early 1. 94.
Mexico excluded Texas from the labor- exchange program on the grounds of widespread violation of contracts, discrimination against migrant workers, and such violations of their civil rights as perfunctory arrests for petty causes. Oblivious to the Mexican charges, some grower organizations in Texas continued to hire undocumented Mexican workers and violate such mandates of PL 7. Mexico, fair and lawful wages, housing, and health services.
World War II and the postwar period exacerbated the Mexican exodus to the United States, as the demand for cheap agricultural laborers increased. Graft and corruption on both sides of the border enriched many Mexican officials as well as unethical . Studies conducted over a period of several years indicate that the Bracero program increased the number of undocumeted immigrants in Texas and the rest of the country.
Because of the low wages paid to legal, contracted braceros, many of them skipped out on their contracts either to return home or to seek unauthorized work elsewhere for better wages. Increasing grievances from various Mexican officials in the United States and Mexico prompted the Mexican government to rescind the bracero agreement and cease the export of Mexican workers. The United States Immigration Service, under pressure from various agricultural groups, retaliated against Mexico in 1. Texas Employment Commission, which delivered them to work for various grower groups in Texas and elsewhere.
Over the long term, this action by the federal government, in violation of immigration laws and the agreement with Mexico, caused new problems for Texas. Between 1. 94. 4 and 1. It is estimated that in 1. Operation Wetback got under way, more than a million workers had crossed the Rio Grande illegally. Cheap labor displaced native agricultural workers, and increased violation of labor laws and discrimination encouraged criminality, disease, and illiteracy. According to a study conducted in 1. President's Commission on Migratory Labor in Texas, the Rio Grande valley cotton growers were paying approximately half of the wages paid elsewhere in Texas.
Uncover detailed information about Wetbacks (1956). Explore interactive visualizations and rich information about the cast, ratings, recommendations, photos, plot.
In 1. 95. 3 a Mc. Allen newspaper clamored for justice in view of continuing criminal activities by . Headed by the commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Gen. Joseph May Swing, the United States Border Patrol, aided by municipal, county, state, and federal authorities, as well as the military, began a quasi- military operation of search and seizure of all unauthorized immigrants. Fanning out from the lower Rio Grande valley, Operation Wetback moved northward. Detained Mexican citizens were repatriated initially through Presidio because the Mexican city across the border, Ojinaga, had rail connections to the interior of Mexico by which workers could be quickly moved on to Durango. A major concern of the operation was to discourage reentry by moving the workers far into the interior.
Movie reviews for Wetbacks. MRQE Metric: See what the critics had to say and watch the trailer. Ver y Descargar Pelicula Wetbacks en Espa
Others were to be sent through El Paso. On July 1. 5, the first day of the operation, 4,8.
Thereafter the daily totals dwindled to an average of about 1,1. The forces used by the government were actually relatively small, perhaps no more than 7. Mexico. Valley newspapers also exaggerated the size of the government forces for their own purposes: generally unfavorable editorials attacked the Border Patrol as an invading army seeking to deprive Valley farmers of their inexpensive labor force. While the numbers of deportees remained relatively high, they were transported across the border on trucks and buses.
As the pace of the operation slowed, deportation by sea began on the Emancipation, which ferried detained Mexicans from Port Isabel, Texas, to Veracruz, and on other ships. Ships were a preferred mode of transport because they carried the Mexican workers farther away from the border than did buses, trucks, or trains. The boat lift continued until the drowning of seven deportees who jumped ship from the Mercurio provoked a mutiny and led to a public outcry against the practice in Mexico. Other unauthorized immigrants, particularly those apprehended in the Midwest states, were flown to Brownsville and sent into Mexico from there. The operation trailed off in the fall of 1. INS funding began to run out. It is difficult to estimate the number of people forced to leave by the operation.
The INS claimed as many as 1,3. The INS estimate rested on the claim that most undocumented immigrants, fearing apprehension by the government, had voluntarily repatriated themselves before and during the operation.
The San Antonio district, which included all of Texas outside of El Paso and the Trans- Pecos, had officially apprehended slightly more than 8. INS officials claimed that an additional 5.
Mexico before the campaign began. Many commentators have considered these figures to be exaggerated.
Various groups opposed any form of temporary labor in the United States. Forum, for instance, by and large had little or no sympathy for the man who crossed the border illegally. Apparently the Texas State Federation of Labor supported the G. I. Eventually the two organizations coproduced a study entitled What Price Wetbacks?, which concluded that illegal immigration in United States agriculture damaged the health of the American people, that undocumented migrant workers displaced American workers, that they harmed the retailers of Mc. Allen, and that the open- border policy of the American government posed a threat to the security of the United States.
Critics of Operation Wetback considered it xenophobic and heartless. Forum: Origins and Evolution (University of Texas Center for Mexican American Studies Monograph 6, Austin, 1. Juan Ramon Garcia, Operation Wetback: The Mass Deportation of Mexican Undocumented Workers in 1. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1. Saturday Evening Post, July 2. Julian Samora, Los Mojados: The Wetback Story (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1. Koestler What.
See related articles by: When. See related articles by: Image Use Disclaimer. All copyrighted materials included within the Handbook of Texas Online are in accordance with Title 1. U. S. C. Section 1. Copyright and “Fair Use” for Non- Profit educational institutions, which permits the Texas State Historical Association (TSHA), to utilize copyrighted materials to further scholarship, education, and inform the public. The TSHA makes every effort to conform to the principles of fair use and to comply with copyright law.
For more information go to: http: //www. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Citation. The following, adapted from the Chicago Manual of Style, 1. Handbook of Texas Online.
Fred L. Modified on March 2.